Dear Host,
I am facing problem during FPGA and DDR-II Simulation. Following error is shown when i start simulation, "No IC output on selected net (i.e. no driver) stopping". Please provide the remedy for this fault.
Regards,
Mohsin
Dear Host,
I am facing problem during FPGA and DDR-II Simulation. Following error is shown when i start simulation, "No IC output on selected net (i.e. no driver) stopping". Please provide the remedy for this fault.
Regards,
Mohsin
Hi all,
I am new to HyperLynx and I a have questions: Currency I am debugging a PCB where we have an FPGA interfacing with ram module. In the attachment I am trying something very basic but I cant seem to get the results I want. I am trying to relate the tdp value in the datasheet for a 3.3 LVTTL driver (low slew 12 mA) to a simulation in HyperLynx. When I do the simulation I get different results. Even after factoring the temperature coefficient in I still do not see the same rise time or output delay that the datasheet suggest in the simulation?
1) What am I doing wrong here ?
2) Also the termination wizard also suggests 1.183 ns driver transition time which is close to the simulated rise time which also doesn't correlate to any figure in the datasheet ?
Best regards,
Sam
Hi!
After I assign models and nets to simulate I receive the following error, while I try to perform the DDR3 batch simulation.
The following devices have inconsistent "Net to IBIS Model/Selector" mappings.
All signals of the same type should share the same IBIS Model/Selector.
Typically, this indicates that a signal net was not categorized correctly.
Controller U10--
Signal_Type Pin# IBIS_Signal IBIS_Model/Selector Net_Name
DQS M38 IP_DDR_0_DQSp BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_CLK_DIFF_M38 CPU_DDR3_DQS0_P
DQS J38 IP_DDR_1_DQSp BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_CLK_DIFF_J38 CPU_DDR3_DQS1_P
DQS F38 IP_DDR_2_DQSp BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_CLK_DIFF_F38 CPU_DDR3_DQS2_P
DQS C38 IP_DDR_3_DQSp BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_CLK_DIFF_C38 CPU_DDR3_DQS3_P
DQS# M37 IP_DDR_0_DQSn BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_CLK_DIFF_M37 CPU_DDR3_DQS0_N
DQS# J37 IP_DDR_1_DQSn BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_CLK_DIFF_J37 CPU_DDR3_DQS1_N
DQS# F37 IP_DDR_2_DQSn BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_CLK_DIFF_F37 CPU_DDR3_DQS2_N
DQS# C37 IP_DDR_3_DQSn BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_CLK_DIFF_C37 CPU_DDR3_DQS3_N
DQ L36 IP_DDR_0_DQ0 GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D0
DQ L38 IP_DDR_0_DQ1 GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D1
DQ K33 IP_DDR_0_DQ2 GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D2
DQ K31 IP_DDR_0_DQ3 GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D3
DQ K34 IP_DDR_0_DQ4 GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D4
DQ J34 IP_DDR_0_DQ5 GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D5
DQ J31 IP_DDR_0_DQ6 GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D6
DQ J32 IP_DDR_0_DQ7 GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D7
DQ G34 IP_DDR_1_DQ2 GRPIDQ1_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D10
DQ G33 IP_DDR_1_DQ3 GRPIDQ1_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D11
DQ H36 IP_DDR_1_DQ4 GRPIDQ1_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D12
DQ F31 IP_DDR_1_DQ5 GRPIDQ1_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D13
DQ G30 IP_DDR_1_DQ6 GRPIDQ1_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D14
DQ G31 IP_DDR_1_DQ7 GRPIDQ1_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D15
DQ F32 IP_DDR_2_DQ0 GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D16
DQ E32 IP_DDR_2_DQ1 GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D17
DQ F35 IP_DDR_2_DQ2 GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D18
DQ E36 IP_DDR_2_DQ3 GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D19
DQ E33 IP_DDR_2_DQ4 GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D20
DQ E38 IP_DDR_2_DQ5 GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D21
DQ D30 IP_DDR_2_DQ6 GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D22
DQ D31 IP_DDR_2_DQ7 GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D23
DQ D34 IP_DDR_3_DQ0 GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D24
DQ C35 IP_DDR_3_DQ1 GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D25
DQ C34 IP_DDR_3_DQ2 GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D26
DQ C32 IP_DDR_3_DQ3 GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D27
DQ D33 IP_DDR_3_DQ4 GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D28
DQ B35 IP_DDR_3_DQ5 GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D29
DQ B38 IP_DDR_3_DQ6 GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D30
DQ B33 IP_DDR_3_DQ7 GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_D31
DM J35 IP_DDR_0_DM GRPIDQ0_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_DQM0
DM H33 IP_DDR_1_DM GRPIDQ1_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_DQM1
DM F34 IP_DDR_2_DM GRPIDQ2_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_DQM2
DM B36 IP_DDR_3_DM GRPIDQ3_BCM28HPMFL3_T1XH_LPDDR3800M_SING CPU_DDR3_DQM3
What could be wrong here. Any help appreciated.
Regards,
M.
Hi, I'm trying to add as many vias into a thermal pad on an IC. I can add about four but then when I try to add more I get an error message "Cannot resolve immovable metal conflicts".
I looked at a previous post in this forum about how to add vias into a conductive pad and followed the advice in that post, here is that link:
https://communities.mentor.com/thread/16731
Ken
Hai
In ddr3 batch the write leveling option is present ,similarly how or where read leveling settings are fed to the simulation engine ?
Read leveling is implemented in the qoriq power pc as CAS to preamble calibration and dq to dqs calibration is there any option incorporated in the new release of hyperlynx 9.2
I'm trying to export a DXF drawing of my assembly outlines and reference designators. For the top side this works fine. On the bottom side all reference designators have an offset. They are starting at the position where they should end.
At first it seems he is trying to mirror the text on a Edge.
But now I tryed all combinations of different text origins, text mirror checkbox & export mirror checkbox enableing and the result is allways the same.
There must be another option.
Is there an alternative to export am assembly drawing?
I'm using X-ENTP VX.1 Update 14
Regards, Michael
Hello,
I have installed the version 7.9.5 of Expedition on Windows 7. In the part editor I can only create parts, but no padstacks or cells. I can use existing cells (in Pin Mapping) but not create them. I used a preinstalled library (HLA CentralLibrary) and made some additional parts. But now I can't create the needed padstacks/cells.
Please can someone help me? Write, if you need additional info.
hi all,
Is there a way to switch on/off the visibility of drill holes in 3D view, or is this a SW problem?
I did not find a way to see drill holes in 3D PCB view. In decal Editor 3D view drill holes are displayed correctly.
Best regards
Erwin
How I change the logical symbols and (&&) or (||)?
It seems that it is not possible to map a 3d model to a component that has protected routes! I have designs done already for which would like to create 3d models of the board. And of course I have protected traces. Dear Mentor, is there another way than unprotecting the traces? Why 3d model association has to be treated like a local decal editing?
Thanks!
Hi,
I assigned a 3d model to a component and saved to library. The help says
Restriction:
You cannot reassign a 3D model to a part if the part is already saved in the library with a 3D model.
So Mentor, please, I have a better model for may part how can I use it?
Thanks!
Hi all,
we are testing in the moment the actual VX release VX1.1.
And I would like ask you some questions about VX and the transition to VX:
- What are your experiences with VX? Is it faster, better or why should we switch to VX? Is it stable?
- How did you transfer your library? Do you maintain two libraries (one for 7.9.x and one for VX)?
- Do you make a hard cut: e.g. after 1st January all designs are on VX, or do you switch design by design over time?
- Do you have an fallback solution to go back to EE7.9.x, if there are bigger problems with VX?
- Are you waiting for VX2-release, cause it has some more nice features? Why?
So I am very interrested in any comments and experiences you have with VX.
Thanks and best regards,
Deborah
I've been using PartQuest successfully for several months. After a multi-week hiatus from PCB design, I'm working on a new board and went through my typical pattern of selecting a part in PartQuest, setting it to download (into my dropbox, which has been successfully integrated since when I started using PartQuest).
So far, so good, however: On selecting Tools -> "Import PartQuest Parts" in xDX Designer, I get the message "There is no product license available on your machine. The PartQuest files will not be decrypted."
The same thing happens if I trigger the import from PADS Layout.
I checked and our PADS licenses are good through 8/2016.
I downloaded and installed the latest PartQuest Integration Utilities, rebooted, same problem.
I deleted the PartQuest folder from the Apps directory of the dropbox and then re-linked the dropbox from my PartQuest profile, triggering the PartQuest folder and all its content to be re-generated. Still no dice.
I switched to the direct download approach and grabbed the part as a .pqz file, extracted it, then ran the import PartQuest parts menu item to import it, same error, (then I edited the PartQuest.ini file to actually point to the directory with the extracted file and THAT ran properly). At this point, I would like to go back to the dropbox method rather than manually downloading part by part, but every time I try, it generates the same error. To check if it had something to do with the files extracted from .pqz files vs files downloaded directly into dropbox, I manually copied a file [that had been pushed by PartQuest to the dropbox directory] into the download folder I'd been extracting .pqz files into, and the import command ran fine importing the file, so it appears the error follows the directory location, not the file delivery method.
Has dropbox functionality been intentionally removed?
Hi,
I'm trying to generate a fsdb output from questa-adms for a mixed signal simulation. Checking the documentation, .option FSDB should do it. After trying the latter option, the fsdb file is generated but is missing the digital signals and only analog signals are included. Both the digital and analog signals show up in the .wdb file.
I also tried the ffcv (eldo) utility to convert the wdb database to fsdb. I get some warnings and checking the fsdb waveforms, the digital signals show up but the analog signals are incomplete/wrong.
This is the warning I observe:
*NOVAS WARN* *FATAL ERROR* Rewinding time is prohibited. Time creation should be skipped.
Thanks for your help.
We are using Visual Basic 2010 Express. I want to add/remove a 3D PCB View using automation???
I can get the collection, and the views within it.
Here is part of the code:
Dim oPCBView As MGCPCB.Views
oPCBViews = oPCBDoc.ViewsEx
Console.Write(vbCrLf & vbCrLf & oPCBViews.Count & vbCrLf)
For x As Integer = 1 To oPCBViews.Count
oPCBView = oPCBViews.Item(x)
oPCBView.Activate()
Console.Write(vbCrLf & oPCBView.Name)
Console.Write(vbCrLf & oPCBView.Type)
Console.Write(vbCrLf & oPCBView.OriginalName)
If oPCBView.Name.Contains("3D View") Then
oPCBView.Delete()
End If
Next
I've recently added a "light pipe" mechanical cell to our library. I would have preferred to create it as a package cell, so it could be placed in schematic, and annotated to the PCB, but alas, the age-old problem of "if it doesn't have a pin, it's not a part". Since this part only requires NPT holes, I can't make it a package cell, so I created it as a Mechanical cell. Now, when I place it the design, it will not allow me to overhang the board edge, and unless they've hidden it in some obscure place, Mechanical cells do not seem to have the "allow cell overhang" check box available. So what's a person supposed to do when they have a mechanical part that is supposed to overhang the board edge by design, but the tool doesn't seem to support that?
Thanks,
Tom D.
Cobham AvComm
Hi All,
I created two symbols for the TLC2272 separating the power and ground as a separate symbol but when I refdes the two symbols the power symbol gets a different refdes number. My guess is I have the PDB set up wrong. I heard the fix is to manually rename the refdes. This makes no sense to me. If I add the symbol to different pages the same thing happens.
Any suggestions would be helpful.
Kirby